Modeling epistasis in mice and yeast using the proportion of two or more distinct genetic backgrounds: Evidence for "polygenic epistasis".

TitleModeling epistasis in mice and yeast using the proportion of two or more distinct genetic backgrounds: Evidence for "polygenic epistasis".
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuthorsRau, CD, Gonzales, NM, Bloom, JS, Park, D, Ayroles, J, Palmer, AA, Lusis, AJ, Zaitlen, N
JournalPLoS Genet
Volume16
Issue10
Paginatione1009165
Date Published2020 10
ISSN1553-7404
KeywordsAlleles, Animals, Epistasis, Genetic, Evolution, Molecular, Genotype, Humans, Mice, Models, Genetic, Multifactorial Inheritance, Phenotype, Quantitative Trait Loci, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Selection, Genetic
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The majority of quantitative genetic models used to map complex traits assume that alleles have similar effects across all individuals. Significant evidence suggests, however, that epistatic interactions modulate the impact of many alleles. Nevertheless, identifying epistatic interactions remains computationally and statistically challenging. In this work, we address some of these challenges by developing a statistical test for polygenic epistasis that determines whether the effect of an allele is altered by the global genetic ancestry proportion from distinct progenitors.

RESULTS: We applied our method to data from mice and yeast. For the mice, we observed 49 significant genotype-by-ancestry interaction associations across 14 phenotypes as well as over 1,400 Bonferroni-corrected genotype-by-ancestry interaction associations for mouse gene expression data. For the yeast, we observed 92 significant genotype-by-ancestry interactions across 38 phenotypes. Given this evidence of epistasis, we test for and observe evidence of rapid selection pressure on ancestry specific polymorphisms within one of the cohorts, consistent with epistatic selection.

CONCLUSIONS: Unlike our prior work in human populations, we observe widespread evidence of ancestry-modified SNP effects, perhaps reflecting the greater divergence present in crosses using mice and yeast.

DOI10.1371/journal.pgen.1009165
Alternate JournalPLoS Genet
PubMed ID33104702
PubMed Central IDPMC7644088
Grant ListK99 HL138301 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
R01 CA227237 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States
U01 HG009080 / HG / NHGRI NIH HHS / United States
R01 HG006399 / HG / NHGRI NIH HHS / United States
R01 HL147883 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
R01 DA021336 / DA / NIDA NIH HHS / United States
F31 DA036358 / DA / NIDA NIH HHS / United States
K25 HL121295 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
R01 DK117850 / DK / NIDDK NIH HHS / United States
T32 GM007197 / GM / NIGMS NIH HHS / United States
R35 GM124881 / GM / NIGMS NIH HHS / United States