@article {132, title = {Disentangling selection on genetically correlated polygenic traits via whole-genome genealogies.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {108}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 02 04}, pages = {219-239}, abstract = {

We present a full-likelihood method to infer polygenic adaptation from DNA sequence variation and GWAS summary statistics to quantify recent transient directional selection acting on a complex trait. Through simulations of polygenic trait architecture evolution and GWASs, we show the method substantially improves power over current methods. We examine the robustness of the method under stratification, uncertainty and bias in marginal effects, uncertainty in the causal SNPs, allelic heterogeneity, negative selection, and low GWAS sample size. The method can quantify selection acting on correlated traits, controlling for pleiotropy even among traits with strong genetic correlation (|r|=80\%) while retaining high power to attribute selection to the causal trait. When the causal trait is excluded from analysis, selection is attributed to its closest proxy. We discuss limitations of the method, cautioning against strongly causal interpretations of the results, and the possibility of undetectable gene-by-environment (GxE) interactions. We apply the method to 56 human polygenic traits, revealing signals of directional selection on pigmentation, life history, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and other traits. We also conduct joint testing of 137 pairs of genetically correlated traits, revealing widespread correlated response acting on these traits (2.6-fold enrichment, p = 1.5~{\texttimes} 10). Signs of selection on some traits previously reported as adaptive (e.g., educational attainment and hair color) are largely attributable to correlated response (p = 2.9~{\texttimes} 10 and 1.7~{\texttimes} 10, respectively). Lastly, our joint test shows antagonistic selection has increased type 2 diabetes risk and decrease HbA1c (p = 1.5~{\texttimes} 10).

}, keywords = {Computer Simulation, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Evolution, Molecular, Gene-Environment Interaction, Genetic Heterogeneity, Genetic Pleiotropy, Genome, Human, Genome-Wide Association Study, Glycated Hemoglobin A, Humans, Models, Genetic, Multifactorial Inheritance, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Sample Size, Selection, Genetic}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.12.005}, author = {Stern, Aaron J and Speidel, Leo and Zaitlen, Noah A and Nielsen, Rasmus} } @article {86, title = {A Robust Method Uncovers Significant Context-Specific Heritability in Diverse Complex Traits.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {106}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 01 02}, pages = {71-91}, abstract = {

Gene-environment interactions (GxE) can be fundamental in applications ranging from functional genomics to precision medicine and is a conjectured source of substantial heritability. However, unbiased methods to profile GxE genome-wide are nascent and, as we show, cannot accommodate general environment variables, modest sample sizes, heterogeneous noise, and binary traits. To address this gap, we propose a simple, unifying mixed model for gene-environment interaction (GxEMM). In simulations and theory, we show that GxEMM can dramatically improve estimates and eliminate false positives when the assumptions of existing methods fail. We apply GxEMM to a range of human and model organism datasets and find broad evidence of context-specific genetic effects, including GxSex, GxAdversity, and GxDisease interactions across thousands of clinical and molecular phenotypes. Overall, GxEMM is broadly applicable for testing and quantifying polygenic interactions, which can be useful for explaining heritability and invaluable for determining biologically relevant environments.

}, keywords = {Adult, Animals, Computer Simulation, Female, Gene-Environment Interaction, Genetic Markers, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Male, Mental Disorders, Middle Aged, Models, Genetic, Multifactorial Inheritance, Phenomics, Phenotype, Rats}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.11.015}, author = {Dahl, Andy and Nguyen, Khiem and Cai, Na and Gandal, Michael J and Flint, Jonathan and Zaitlen, Noah} } @article {37, title = {An ancestry-based approach for detecting interactions.}, journal = {Genet Epidemiol}, volume = {42}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 02}, pages = {49-63}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Epistasis and gene-environment interactions are known to contribute significantly to variation of complex phenotypes in model organisms. However, their identification in human association studies remains challenging for myriad reasons. In the case of epistatic interactions, the large number of potential interacting sets of genes presents computational, multiple hypothesis correction, and other statistical power issues. In the case of gene-environment interactions, the lack of consistently measured environmental covariates in most disease studies precludes searching for interactions and creates difficulties for replicating studies.

RESULTS: In this work, we develop a new statistical approach to address these issues that leverages genetic ancestry, defined as the proportion of ancestry derived from each ancestral population (e.g., the fraction of European/African ancestry in African Americans), in admixed populations. We applied our method to gene expression and methylation data from African American and Latino admixed individuals, respectively, identifying nine interactions that were significant at P<5{\texttimes}10-8. We show that two of the interactions in methylation data replicate, and the remaining six are significantly enriched for low P-values (P<1.8{\texttimes}10-6).

CONCLUSION: We show that genetic ancestry can be a useful proxy for unknown and unmeasured covariates in the search for interaction effects. These results have important implications for our understanding of the genetic architecture of complex traits.

}, keywords = {African Americans, African Continental Ancestry Group, DNA Methylation, Epistasis, Genetic, European Continental Ancestry Group, Gene-Environment Interaction, Hispanic Americans, Humans, Models, Genetic, Phenotype}, issn = {1098-2272}, doi = {10.1002/gepi.22087}, author = {Park, Danny S and Eskin, Itamar and Kang, Eun Yong and Gamazon, Eric R and Eng, Celeste and Gignoux, Christopher R and Galanter, Joshua M and Burchard, Esteban and Ye, Chun J and Aschard, Hugues and Eskin, Eleazar and Halperin, Eran and Zaitlen, Noah} } @article {20, title = {Testing for gene-environment interaction under exposure misspecification.}, journal = {Biometrics}, volume = {74}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Jun}, pages = {653-662}, abstract = {

Complex interplay between genetic and environmental factors characterizes the etiology of many diseases. Modeling gene-environment (GxE) interactions is often challenged by the unknown functional form of the environment term in the true data-generating mechanism. We study the impact of misspecification of the environmental exposure effect on inference for the GxE interaction term in linear and logistic regression models. We first examine the asymptotic bias of the GxE interaction regression coefficient, allowing for confounders as well as arbitrary misspecification of the exposure and confounder effects. For linear regression, we show that under gene-environment independence and some confounder-dependent conditions, when the environment effect is misspecified, the regression coefficient of the GxE interaction can be unbiased. However, inference on the GxE interaction is still often incorrect. In logistic regression, we show that the regression coefficient is generally biased if the genetic factor is associated with the outcome directly or indirectly. Further, we show that the standard robust sandwich variance estimator for the GxE interaction does not perform well in practical GxE studies, and we provide an alternative testing procedure that has better finite sample properties.

}, keywords = {Bias, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Environmental Exposure, Gene-Environment Interaction, Humans, Linear Models, Models, Genetic, Scientific Experimental Error}, issn = {1541-0420}, doi = {10.1111/biom.12813}, author = {Sun, Ryan and Carroll, Raymond J and Christiani, David C and Lin, Xihong} } @article {22, title = {Current Challenges and New Opportunities for Gene-Environment Interaction Studies of Complex Diseases.}, journal = {Am J Epidemiol}, volume = {186}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Oct 01}, pages = {753-761}, abstract = {

Recently, many new approaches, study designs, and statistical and analytical methods have emerged for studying gene-environment interactions (G{\texttimes}Es) in large-scale studies of human populations. There are opportunities in this field, particularly with respect to the incorporation of -omics and next-generation sequencing data and continual improvement in measures of environmental exposures implicated in complex disease outcomes. In a workshop called "Current Challenges and New Opportunities for Gene-Environment Interaction Studies of Complex Diseases," held October 17-18, 2014, by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the National Cancer Institute in conjunction with the annual American Society of Human Genetics meeting, participants explored new approaches and tools that have been developed in recent years for G{\texttimes}E discovery. This paper highlights current and critical issues and themes in G{\texttimes}E research that need additional consideration, including the improved data analytical methods, environmental exposure assessment, and incorporation of functional data and annotations.

}, keywords = {Disease, Gene-Environment Interaction, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Software}, issn = {1476-6256}, doi = {10.1093/aje/kwx227}, author = {McAllister, Kimberly and Mechanic, Leah E and Amos, Christopher and Aschard, Hugues and Blair, Ian A and Chatterjee, Nilanjan and Conti, David and Gauderman, W James and Hsu, Li and Hutter, Carolyn M and Jankowska, Marta M and Kerr, Jacqueline and Kraft, Peter and Montgomery, Stephen B and Mukherjee, Bhramar and Papanicolaou, George J and Patel, Chirag J and Ritchie, Marylyn D and Ritz, Beate R and Thomas, Duncan C and Wei, Peng and Witte, John S} } @article {19, title = {A genetic stochastic process model for genome-wide joint analysis of biomarker dynamics and disease susceptibility with longitudinal data.}, journal = {Genet Epidemiol}, volume = {41}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Nov}, pages = {620-635}, abstract = {

Unraveling the underlying biological mechanisms or pathways behind the effects of genetic variations on complex diseases remains one of the major challenges in the post-GWAS (where GWAS is genome-wide association study) era. To further explore the relationship between genetic variations, biomarkers, and diseases for elucidating underlying pathological mechanism, a huge effort has been placed on examining pleiotropic and gene-environmental interaction effects. We propose a novel genetic stochastic process model (GSPM) that can be applied to GWAS and jointly investigate the genetic effects on longitudinally measured biomarkers and risks of diseases. This model is characterized by more profound biological interpretation and takes into account the dynamics of biomarkers during follow-up when investigating the hazards of a disease. We illustrate the rationale and evaluate the performance of the proposed model through two GWAS. One is to detect single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) having interaction effects on type 2 diabetes (T2D) with body mass index (BMI) and the other is to detect SNPs affecting the optimal BMI level for protecting from T2D. We identified multiple SNPs that showed interaction effects with BMI on T2D, including a novel SNP rs11757677 in the CDKAL1 gene (P = 5.77 {\texttimes} 10 ). We also found a SNP rs1551133 located on 2q14.2 that reversed the effect of BMI on T2D (P = 6.70 {\texttimes} 10 ). In conclusion, the proposed GSPM provides a promising and useful tool in GWAS of longitudinal data for interrogating pleiotropic and interaction effects to gain more insights into the relationship between genes, quantitative biomarkers, and risks of complex diseases.

}, keywords = {Biomarkers, Body Mass Index, Computational Biology, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Gene-Environment Interaction, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Male, Models, Genetic, Models, Statistical, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk, Stochastic Processes}, issn = {1098-2272}, doi = {10.1002/gepi.22058}, author = {He, Liang and Zhbannikov, Ilya and Arbeev, Konstantin G and Yashin, Anatoliy I and Kulminski, Alexander M} } @article {23, title = {Incorporation of Biological Knowledge Into the Study of Gene-Environment Interactions.}, journal = {Am J Epidemiol}, volume = {186}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Oct 01}, pages = {771-777}, abstract = {

A growing knowledge base of genetic and environmental information has greatly enabled the study of disease risk factors. However, the computational complexity and statistical burden of testing all variants by all environments has required novel study designs and hypothesis-driven approaches. We discuss how incorporating biological knowledge from model organisms, functional genomics, and integrative approaches can empower the discovery of novel gene-environment interactions and discuss specific methodological considerations with each approach. We consider specific examples where the application of these approaches has uncovered effects of gene-environment interactions relevant to drug response and immunity, and we highlight how such improvements enable a greater understanding of the pathogenesis of disease and the realization of precision medicine.

}, keywords = {Animals, Disease, Gene-Environment Interaction, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genomics, Humans, Models, Animal, Sequence Analysis, RNA}, issn = {1476-6256}, doi = {10.1093/aje/kwx229}, author = {Ritchie, Marylyn D and Davis, Joe R and Aschard, Hugues and Battle, Alexis and Conti, David and Du, Mengmeng and Eskin, Eleazar and Fallin, M Daniele and Hsu, Li and Kraft, Peter and Moore, Jason H and Pierce, Brandon L and Bien, Stephanie A and Thomas, Duncan C and Wei, Peng and Montgomery, Stephen B} } @article {24, title = {Lessons Learned From Past Gene-Environment Interaction Successes.}, journal = {Am J Epidemiol}, volume = {186}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Oct 01}, pages = {778-786}, abstract = {

Genetic and environmental factors are both known to contribute to susceptibility to complex diseases. Therefore, the study of gene-environment interaction (G{\texttimes}E) has been a focus of research for several years. In this article, select examples of G{\texttimes}E from the literature are described to highlight different approaches and underlying principles related to the success of these studies. These examples can be broadly categorized as studies of single metabolism genes, genes in complex metabolism pathways, ranges of exposure levels, functional approaches and model systems, and pharmacogenomics. Some studies illustrated the success of studying exposure metabolism for which candidate genes can be identified. Moreover, some G{\texttimes}E successes depended on the availability of high-quality exposure assessment and longitudinal measures, study populations with a wide range of exposure levels, and the inclusion of ethnically and geographically diverse populations. In several examples, large population sizes were required to detect G{\texttimes}Es. Other examples illustrated the impact of accurately defining scale of the interactions (i.e., additive or multiplicative). Last, model systems and functional approaches provided insights into G{\texttimes}E in several examples. Future studies may benefit from these lessons learned.

}, keywords = {Biomedical Research, Disease, Environmental Exposure, Gene-Environment Interaction, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Variation, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Models, Biological}, issn = {1476-6256}, doi = {10.1093/aje/kwx230}, author = {Ritz, Beate R and Chatterjee, Nilanjan and Garcia-Closas, Montserrat and Gauderman, W James and Pierce, Brandon L and Kraft, Peter and Tanner, Caroline M and Mechanic, Leah E and McAllister, Kimberly} }