@article {124, title = {Modeling epistasis in mice and yeast using the proportion of two or more distinct genetic backgrounds: Evidence for "polygenic epistasis".}, journal = {PLoS Genet}, volume = {16}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 10}, pages = {e1009165}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: The majority of quantitative genetic models used to map complex traits assume that alleles have similar effects across all individuals. Significant evidence suggests, however, that epistatic interactions modulate the impact of many alleles. Nevertheless, identifying epistatic interactions remains computationally and statistically challenging. In this work, we address some of these challenges by developing a statistical test for polygenic epistasis that determines whether the effect of an allele is altered by the global genetic ancestry proportion from distinct progenitors.

RESULTS: We applied our method to data from mice and yeast. For the mice, we observed 49 significant genotype-by-ancestry interaction associations across 14 phenotypes as well as over 1,400 Bonferroni-corrected genotype-by-ancestry interaction associations for mouse gene expression data. For the yeast, we observed 92 significant genotype-by-ancestry interactions across 38 phenotypes. Given this evidence of epistasis, we test for and observe evidence of rapid selection pressure on ancestry specific polymorphisms within one of the cohorts, consistent with epistatic selection.

CONCLUSIONS: Unlike our prior work in human populations, we observe widespread evidence of ancestry-modified SNP effects, perhaps reflecting the greater divergence present in crosses using mice and yeast.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Animals, Epistasis, Genetic, Evolution, Molecular, Genotype, Humans, Mice, Models, Genetic, Multifactorial Inheritance, Phenotype, Quantitative Trait Loci, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Selection, Genetic}, issn = {1553-7404}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1009165}, author = {Rau, Christoph D and Gonzales, Natalia M and Bloom, Joshua S and Park, Danny and Ayroles, Julien and Palmer, Abraham A and Lusis, Aldons J and Zaitlen, Noah} } @article {37, title = {An ancestry-based approach for detecting interactions.}, journal = {Genet Epidemiol}, volume = {42}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Feb}, pages = {49-63}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Epistasis and gene-environment interactions are known to contribute significantly to variation of complex phenotypes in model organisms. However, their identification in human association studies remains challenging for myriad reasons. In the case of epistatic interactions, the large number of potential interacting sets of genes presents computational, multiple hypothesis correction, and other statistical power issues. In the case of gene-environment interactions, the lack of consistently measured environmental covariates in most disease studies precludes searching for interactions and creates difficulties for replicating studies.

RESULTS: In this work, we develop a new statistical approach to address these issues that leverages genetic ancestry, defined as the proportion of ancestry derived from each ancestral population (e.g., the fraction of European/African ancestry in African Americans), in admixed populations. We applied our method to gene expression and methylation data from African American and Latino admixed individuals, respectively, identifying nine interactions that were significant at P<5{\texttimes}10-8. We show that two of the interactions in methylation data replicate, and the remaining six are significantly enriched for low P-values (P<1.8{\texttimes}10-6).

CONCLUSION: We show that genetic ancestry can be a useful proxy for unknown and unmeasured covariates in the search for interaction effects. These results have important implications for our understanding of the genetic architecture of complex traits.

}, keywords = {Black or African American, Black People, DNA Methylation, Epistasis, Genetic, Gene-Environment Interaction, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, White People}, issn = {1098-2272}, doi = {10.1002/gepi.22087}, author = {Park, Danny S and Eskin, Itamar and Kang, Eun Yong and Gamazon, Eric R and Eng, Celeste and Gignoux, Christopher R and Galanter, Joshua M and Burchard, Esteban and Ye, Chun J and Aschard, Hugues and Eskin, Eleazar and Halperin, Eran and Zaitlen, Noah} } @article {13, title = {Negative selection in humans and fruit flies involves synergistic epistasis.}, journal = {Science}, volume = {356}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 May 05}, pages = {539-542}, abstract = {

Negative selection against deleterious alleles produced by mutation influences within-population variation as the most pervasive form of natural selection. However, it is not known whether deleterious alleles affect fitness independently, so that cumulative fitness loss depends exponentially on the number of deleterious alleles, or synergistically, so that each additional deleterious allele results in a larger decrease in relative fitness. Negative selection with synergistic epistasis should produce negative linkage disequilibrium between deleterious alleles and, therefore, an underdispersed distribution of the number of deleterious alleles in the genome. Indeed, we detected underdispersion of the number of rare loss-of-function alleles in eight independent data sets from human and fly populations. Thus, selection against rare protein-disrupting alleles is characterized by synergistic epistasis, which may explain how human and fly populations persist despite high genomic mutation rates.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Animals, Drosophila melanogaster, Epistasis, Genetic, Genetic Fitness, Genome, Human, Genome, Insect, Humans, Linkage Disequilibrium, Mutation Rate, Mutation, Missense, Selection, Genetic}, issn = {1095-9203}, doi = {10.1126/science.aah5238}, author = {Sohail, Mashaal and Vakhrusheva, Olga A and Sul, Jae Hoon and Pulit, Sara L and Francioli, Laurent C and van den Berg, Leonard H and Veldink, Jan H and de Bakker, Paul I W and Bazykin, Georgii A and Kondrashov, Alexey S and Sunyaev, Shamil R} }