@article {114,
	title = {Genetics of 35 blood and urine biomarkers in the UK Biobank.},
	journal = {Nat Genet},
	volume = {53},
	year = {2021},
	month = {2021 02},
	pages = {185-194},
	abstract = {<p>Clinical laboratory tests are a critical component of the continuum of care. We evaluate the genetic basis of 35 blood and urine laboratory measurements in the UK Biobank (n = 363,228 individuals). We identify 1,857 loci associated with at least one trait, containing 3,374 fine-mapped associations and additional sets of large-effect (>0.1 s.d.) protein-altering, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and copy number variant (CNV) associations. Through Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis, we discover 51 causal relationships, including previously known agonistic effects of urate on gout and cystatin C on stroke. Finally, we develop polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for each biomarker and build {\textquoteright}multi-PRS{\textquoteright} models for diseases using 35 PRSs simultaneously, which improved chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, gout and alcoholic cirrhosis genetic risk stratification in an independent dataset (FinnGen; n = 135,500) relative to single-disease PRSs. Together, our results delineate the genetic basis of biomarkers and their causal influences on diseases and improve genetic risk stratification for common diseases.</p>},
	keywords = {Biological Specimen Banks, Biomarkers, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, DNA Copy Number Variations, Genetic Pleiotropy, HLA Antigens, Humans, Linkage Disequilibrium, Liver-Specific Organic Anion Transporter 1, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Proteins, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Serine Endopeptidases, United Kingdom},
	issn = {1546-1718},
	doi = {10.1038/s41588-020-00757-z},
	author = {Sinnott-Armstrong, Nasa and Tanigawa, Yosuke and Amar, David and Mars, Nina and Benner, Christian and Aguirre, Matthew and Venkataraman, Guhan Ram and Wainberg, Michael and Ollila, Hanna M and Kiiskinen, Tuomo and Havulinna, Aki S and Pirruccello, James P and Qian, Junyang and Shcherbina, Anna and Rodriguez, Fatima and Assimes, Themistocles L and Agarwala, Vineeta and Tibshirani, Robert and Hastie, Trevor and Ripatti, Samuli and Pritchard, Jonathan K and Daly, Mark J and Rivas, Manuel A}
}
@article {104,
	title = {FasTag: Automatic text classification of unstructured medical narratives.},
	journal = {PLoS One},
	volume = {15},
	year = {2020},
	month = {2020},
	pages = {e0234647},
	abstract = {<p>Unstructured clinical narratives are continuously being recorded as part of delivery of care in electronic health records, and dedicated tagging staff spend considerable effort manually assigning clinical codes for billing purposes. Despite these efforts, however, label availability and accuracy are both suboptimal. In this retrospective study, we aimed to automate the assignment of top-level International Classification of Diseases version 9 (ICD-9) codes to clinical records from human and veterinary data stores using minimal manual labor and feature curation. Automating top-level annotations could in turn enable rapid cohort identification, especially in a veterinary setting. To this end, we trained long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural networks (RNNs) on 52,722 human and 89,591 veterinary records. We investigated the accuracy of both separate-domain and combined-domain models and probed model portability. We established relevant baseline classification performances by training Decision Trees (DT) and Random Forests (RF). We also investigated whether transforming the data using MetaMap Lite, a clinical natural language processing tool, affected classification performance. We showed that the LSTM-RNNs accurately classify veterinary and human text narratives into top-level categories with an average weighted macro F1 score of 0.74 and 0.68 respectively. In the "neoplasia" category, the model trained on veterinary data had a high validation accuracy in veterinary data and moderate accuracy in human data, with F1 scores of 0.91 and 0.70 respectively. Our LSTM method scored slightly higher than that of the DT and RF models. The use of LSTM-RNN models represents a scalable structure that could prove useful in cohort identification for comparative oncology studies. Digitization of human and veterinary health information will continue to be a reality, particularly in the form of unstructured narratives. Our approach is a step forward for these two domains to learn from and inform one another.</p>},
	keywords = {Animals, Automation, Data Mining, Databases as Topic, Humans, Narrative Medicine, Reproducibility of Results, Software, Species Specificity},
	issn = {1932-6203},
	doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0234647},
	author = {Venkataraman, Guhan Ram and Pineda, Arturo Lopez and Bear Don{\textquoteright}t Walk Iv, Oliver J and Zehnder, Ashley M and Ayyar, Sandeep and Page, Rodney L and Bustamante, Carlos D and Rivas, Manuel A}
}
