@article {100, title = {On the cross-population generalizability of gene expression prediction models.}, journal = {PLoS Genet}, volume = {16}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 08}, pages = {e1008927}, abstract = {

The genetic control of gene expression is a core component of human physiology. For the past several years, transcriptome-wide association studies have leveraged large datasets of linked genotype and RNA sequencing information to create a powerful gene-based test of association that has been used in dozens of studies. While numerous discoveries have been made, the populations in the training data are overwhelmingly of European descent, and little is known about the generalizability of these models to other populations. Here, we test for cross-population generalizability of gene expression prediction models using a dataset of African American individuals with RNA-Seq data in whole blood. We find that the default models trained in large datasets such as GTEx and DGN fare poorly in African Americans, with a notable reduction in prediction accuracy when compared to European Americans. We replicate these limitations in cross-population generalizability using the five populations in the GEUVADIS dataset. Via realistic simulations of both populations and gene expression, we show that accurate cross-population generalizability of transcriptome prediction only arises when eQTL architecture is substantially shared across populations. In contrast, models with non-identical eQTLs showed patterns similar to real-world data. Therefore, generating RNA-Seq data in diverse populations is a critical step towards multi-ethnic utility of gene expression prediction.

}, keywords = {African Americans, Gene Expression Profiling, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Models, Genetic, Quantitative Trait Loci, Reference Standards, RNA-Seq, Transcriptome}, issn = {1553-7404}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1008927}, author = {Keys, Kevin L and Mak, Angel C Y and White, Marquitta J and Eckalbar, Walter L and Dahl, Andrew W and Mefford, Joel and Mikhaylova, Anna V and Contreras, Mar{\'\i}a G and Elhawary, Jennifer R and Eng, Celeste and Hu, Donglei and Huntsman, Scott and Oh, Sam S and Salazar, Sandra and LeNoir, Michael A and Ye, Jimmie C and Thornton, Timothy A and Zaitlen, Noah and Burchard, Esteban G and Gignoux, Christopher R} } @article {37, title = {An ancestry-based approach for detecting interactions.}, journal = {Genet Epidemiol}, volume = {42}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Feb}, pages = {49-63}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Epistasis and gene-environment interactions are known to contribute significantly to variation of complex phenotypes in model organisms. However, their identification in human association studies remains challenging for myriad reasons. In the case of epistatic interactions, the large number of potential interacting sets of genes presents computational, multiple hypothesis correction, and other statistical power issues. In the case of gene-environment interactions, the lack of consistently measured environmental covariates in most disease studies precludes searching for interactions and creates difficulties for replicating studies.

RESULTS: In this work, we develop a new statistical approach to address these issues that leverages genetic ancestry, defined as the proportion of ancestry derived from each ancestral population (e.g., the fraction of European/African ancestry in African Americans), in admixed populations. We applied our method to gene expression and methylation data from African American and Latino admixed individuals, respectively, identifying nine interactions that were significant at P<5{\texttimes}10-8. We show that two of the interactions in methylation data replicate, and the remaining six are significantly enriched for low P-values (P<1.8{\texttimes}10-6).

CONCLUSION: We show that genetic ancestry can be a useful proxy for unknown and unmeasured covariates in the search for interaction effects. These results have important implications for our understanding of the genetic architecture of complex traits.

}, keywords = {Black or African American, Black People, DNA Methylation, Epistasis, Genetic, Gene-Environment Interaction, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, White People}, issn = {1098-2272}, doi = {10.1002/gepi.22087}, author = {Park, Danny S and Eskin, Itamar and Kang, Eun Yong and Gamazon, Eric R and Eng, Celeste and Gignoux, Christopher R and Galanter, Joshua M and Burchard, Esteban and Ye, Chun J and Aschard, Hugues and Eskin, Eleazar and Halperin, Eran and Zaitlen, Noah} } @article {61, title = {Genetic diversity in populations across Latin America: implications for population and medical genetic studies.}, journal = {Curr Opin Genet Dev}, volume = {53}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 12}, pages = {98-104}, abstract = {

Hispanic/Latino (H/L) populations, although linked by culture and aspects of shared history, reflect the complexity of history and migration influencing the Americas. The original settlement by indigenous Americans, followed by postcolonial admixture from multiple continents, has yielded localized genetic patterns. In addition, numerous H/L populations appear to have signatures of pre-colonization and post-colonization bottlenecks, indicating that tens of millions of H/Ls may harbor signatures of founder effects today. Based on both population and medical genetic findings we highlight the extreme differentiation across the Americas, providing evidence for why H/Ls should not be considered a single population in modern human genetics. We highlight the need for additional sampling of understudied H/L groups, and ramifications of these findings for genomic medicine in one-tenth of the world{\textquoteright}s population.

}, keywords = {African Continental Ancestry Group, European Continental Ancestry Group, Genetic Variation, Genetics, Medical, Genetics, Population, Genome, Human, Genomics, Humans, Latin America}, issn = {1879-0380}, doi = {10.1016/j.gde.2018.07.006}, author = {Belbin, Gillian M and Nieves-Col{\'o}n, Maria A and Kenny, Eimear E and Moreno-Estrada, Andres and Gignoux, Christopher R} } @article {39, title = {Imputation-Aware Tag SNP Selection To Improve Power for Large-Scale, Multi-ethnic Association Studies.}, journal = {G3 (Bethesda)}, volume = {8}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Oct 03}, pages = {3255-3267}, abstract = {

The emergence of very large cohorts in genomic research has facilitated a focus on genotype-imputation strategies to power rare variant association. These strategies have benefited from improvements in imputation methods and association tests, however little attention has been paid to ways in which array design can increase rare variant association power. Therefore, we developed a novel framework to select tag SNPs using the reference panel of 26 populations from Phase 3 of the 1000 Genomes Project. We evaluate tag SNP performance mean imputed r at untyped sites using leave-one-out internal validation and standard imputation methods, rather than pairwise linkage disequilibrium. Moving beyond pairwise metrics allows us to account for haplotype diversity across the genome for improve imputation accuracy and demonstrates population-specific biases from pairwise estimates. We also examine array design strategies that contrast multi-ethnic cohorts single populations, and show a boost in performance for the former can be obtained by prioritizing tag SNPs that contribute information across multiple populations simultaneously. Using our framework, we demonstrate increased imputation accuracy for rare variants (frequency < 1\%) by 0.5-3.1\% for an array of one million sites and 0.7-7.1\% for an array of 500,000 sites, depending on the population. Finally, we show how recent explosive growth in non-African populations means tag SNPs capture on average 30\% fewer other variants than in African populations. The unified framework presented here will enable investigators to make informed decisions for the design of new arrays, and help empower the next phase of rare variant association for global health.

}, keywords = {Computational Biology, Databases, Nucleic Acid, Ethnicity, Genetic Association Studies, Genetics, Population, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Linkage Disequilibrium, Models, Genetic, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Reproducibility of Results, Selection, Genetic}, issn = {2160-1836}, doi = {10.1534/g3.118.200502}, author = {Wojcik, Genevieve L and Fuchsberger, Christian and Taliun, Daniel and Welch, Ryan and Martin, Alicia R and Shringarpure, Suyash and Carlson, Christopher S and Abecasis, Goncalo and Kang, Hyun Min and Boehnke, Michael and Bustamante, Carlos D and Gignoux, Christopher R and Kenny, Eimear E} } @article {32, title = {Genetic identification of a common collagen disease in puerto ricans via identity-by-descent mapping in a health system.}, journal = {Elife}, volume = {6}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Sep 12}, abstract = {

Achieving confidence in the causality of a disease locus is a complex task that often requires supporting data from both statistical genetics and clinical genomics. Here we describe a combined approach to identify and characterize a genetic disorder that leverages distantly related patients in a health system and population-scale mapping. We utilize genomic data to uncover components of distant pedigrees, in the absence of recorded pedigree information, in the multi-ethnic Bio biobank in New York City. By linking to medical records, we discover a locus associated with both elevated genetic relatedness and extreme short stature. We link the gene, , with a little-known genetic disease, previously thought to be rare and recessive. We demonstrate that disease manifests in both heterozygotes and homozygotes, indicating a common collagen disorder impacting up to 2\% of individuals of Puerto Rican ancestry, leading to a better understanding of the continuum of complex and Mendelian disease.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Collagen Diseases, Female, Fibrillar Collagens, Genotype, Heterozygote, Hispanic or Latino, Homozygote, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Molecular Epidemiology, Multigene Family, Musculoskeletal Diseases, New York City, Pedigree, Whole Genome Sequencing, Young Adult}, issn = {2050-084X}, doi = {10.7554/eLife.25060}, author = {Belbin, Gillian Morven and Odgis, Jacqueline and Sorokin, Elena P and Yee, Muh-Ching and Kohli, Sumita and Glicksberg, Benjamin S and Gignoux, Christopher R and Wojcik, Genevieve L and Van Vleck, Tielman and Jeff, Janina M and Linderman, Michael and Schurmann, Claudia and Ruderfer, Douglas and Cai, Xiaoqiang and Merkelson, Amanda and Justice, Anne E and Young, Kristin L and Graff, Misa and North, Kari E and Peters, Ulrike and James, Regina and Hindorff, Lucia and Kornreich, Ruth and Edelmann, Lisa and Gottesman, Omri and Stahl, Eli Ea and Cho, Judy H and Loos, Ruth Jf and Bottinger, Erwin P and Nadkarni, Girish N and Abul-Husn, Noura S and Kenny, Eimear E} } @article {14, title = {Human Demographic History Impacts Genetic Risk Prediction across Diverse Populations.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {100}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Apr 06}, pages = {635-649}, abstract = {

The vast majority of genome-wide association studies (GWASs) are performed in Europeans, and their transferability to other populations is dependent on many factors (e.g., linkage disequilibrium, allele frequencies, genetic architecture). As medical genomics studies become increasingly large and diverse, gaining insights into population history and consequently the transferability of disease risk measurement is critical. Here, we disentangle recent population history in the widely used 1000 Genomes Project reference panel, with an emphasis on populations underrepresented in medical studies. To examine the transferability of single-ancestry GWASs, we used published summary statistics to calculate polygenic risk scores for eight well-studied phenotypes. We identify directional inconsistencies in all scores; for example, height is predicted to decrease with genetic distance from Europeans, despite robust anthropological evidence that West Africans are as tall as Europeans on average. To gain deeper quantitative insights into GWAS transferability, we developed a complex trait coalescent-based simulation framework considering effects of polygenicity, causal allele frequency divergence, and heritability. As expected, correlations between true and inferred risk are typically highest in the population from which summary statistics were derived. We demonstrate that scores inferred from European GWASs are biased by genetic drift in other populations even when choosing the same causal variants and that biases in any direction are possible and unpredictable. This work cautions that summarizing findings from large-scale GWASs may have limited portability to other populations using standard approaches and highlights the need for generalized risk prediction methods and the inclusion of more diverse individuals in medical genomics.

}, keywords = {Americas, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetics, Medical, Genetics, Population, Haplotypes, Human Genome Project, Humans, Multifactorial Inheritance, Racial Groups}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.03.004}, author = {Martin, Alicia R and Gignoux, Christopher R and Walters, Raymond K and Wojcik, Genevieve L and Neale, Benjamin M and Gravel, Simon and Daly, Mark J and Bustamante, Carlos D and Kenny, Eimear E} }