@article {95, title = {Impact of admixture and ancestry on eQTL analysis and GWAS colocalization in GTEx.}, journal = {Genome Biol}, volume = {21}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 09 11}, pages = {233}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Population structure among study subjects may confound genetic association studies, and lack of proper correction can lead to spurious findings. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project largely contains individuals of European ancestry, but the v8 release also includes up to 15\% of individuals of non-European ancestry. Assessing ancestry-based adjustments in GTEx improves portability of this research across populations and further characterizes the impact of population structure on GWAS colocalization.

RESULTS: Here, we identify a subset of 117 individuals in GTEx (v8) with a high degree of population admixture and estimate genome-wide local ancestry. We perform genome-wide cis-eQTL mapping using admixed samples in seven tissues, adjusted by either global or local ancestry. Consistent with previous work, we observe improved power with local ancestry adjustment. At loci where the two adjustments produce different lead variants, we observe 31 loci (0.02\%) where a significant colocalization is called only with one eQTL ancestry adjustment method. Notably, both adjustments produce similar numbers of significant colocalizations within each of two different colocalization methods, COLOC and FINEMAP. Finally, we identify a small subset of eQTL-associated variants highly correlated with local ancestry, providing a resource to enhance functional follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS: We provide a local ancestry map for admixed individuals in the GTEx v8 release and describe the impact of ancestry and admixture on gene expression, eQTLs, and GWAS colocalization. While the majority of the results are concordant between local and global ancestry-based adjustments, we identify distinct advantages and disadvantages to each approach.

}, issn = {1474-760X}, doi = {10.1186/s13059-020-02113-0}, author = {Gay, Nicole R and Gloudemans, Michael and Antonio, Margaret L and Abell, Nathan S and Balliu, Brunilda and Park, YoSon and Martin, Alicia R and Musharoff, Shaila and Rao, Abhiram S and Aguet, Francois and Barbeira, Alvaro N and Bonazzola, Rodrigo and Hormozdiari, Farhad and Ardlie, Kristin G and Brown, Christopher D and Im, Hae Kyung and Lappalainen, Tuuli and Wen, Xiaoquan and Montgomery, Stephen B} } @article {67, title = {Extreme Polygenicity of Complex Traits Is Explained by Negative Selection.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {105}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 Sep 05}, pages = {456-476}, abstract = {

Complex traits and common diseases are extremely polygenic, their heritability spread across thousands of loci. One possible explanation is that thousands of genes and loci have similarly important biological effects when mutated. However, we hypothesize that for most complex traits, relatively few genes and loci are critical, and negative selection-purging large-effect mutations in these regions-leaves behind common-variant associations in thousands of less critical regions instead. We refer to this phenomenon as flattening. To quantify its effects, we introduce a mathematical definition of polygenicity, the effective number of independently associated SNPs (M), which describes how evenly the heritability of a trait is spread across the genome. We developed a method, stratified LD fourth moments regression (S-LD4M), to estimate M, validating that it produces robust estimates in simulations. Analyzing 33 complex traits (average N = 361k), we determined that heritability is spread \~{}4{\texttimes} more evenly among common SNPs than among low-frequency SNPs. This difference, together with evolutionary modeling of new mutations, suggests that complex traits would be orders of magnitude less polygenic if not for the influence of negative selection. We also determined that heritability is spread more evenly within functionally important regions in proportion to their heritability enrichment; functionally important regions do not harbor common SNPs with greatly increased causal effect sizes, due to selective constraint. Our results suggest that for most complex traits, the genes and loci with the most critical biological effects often differ from those with the strongest common-variant associations.

}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.07.003}, author = {O{\textquoteright}Connor, Luke J and Schoech, Armin P and Hormozdiari, Farhad and Gazal, Steven and Patterson, Nick and Price, Alkes L} }