@article {59, title = {Adjusting for Principal Components of Molecular Phenotypes Induces Replicating False Positives.}, journal = {Genetics}, volume = {211}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 04}, pages = {1179-1189}, abstract = {

High-throughput measurements of molecular phenotypes provide an unprecedented opportunity to model cellular processes and their impact on disease. These highly structured datasets are usually strongly confounded, creating false positives and reducing power. This has motivated many approaches based on principal components analysis (PCA) to estimate and correct for confounders, which have become indispensable elements of association tests between molecular phenotypes and both genetic and nongenetic factors. Here, we show that these correction approaches induce a bias, and that it persists for large sample sizes and replicates out-of-sample. We prove this theoretically for PCA by deriving an analytic, deterministic, and intuitive bias approximation. We assess other methods with realistic simulations, which show that perturbing any of several basic parameters can cause false positive rate (FPR) inflation. Our experiments show the bias depends on covariate and confounder sparsity, effect sizes, and their correlation. Surprisingly, when the covariate and confounder have [Formula: see text], standard two-step methods all have [Formula: see text]-fold FPR inflation. Our analysis informs best practices for confounder correction in genomic studies, and suggests many false discoveries have been made and replicated in some differential expression analyses.

}, keywords = {Animals, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Principal Component Analysis, Quantitative Trait Loci, Reproducibility of Results}, issn = {1943-2631}, doi = {10.1534/genetics.118.301768}, author = {Dahl, Andy and Guillemot, Vincent and Mefford, Joel and Aschard, Hugues and Zaitlen, Noah} } @article {37, title = {An ancestry-based approach for detecting interactions.}, journal = {Genet Epidemiol}, volume = {42}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 02}, pages = {49-63}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Epistasis and gene-environment interactions are known to contribute significantly to variation of complex phenotypes in model organisms. However, their identification in human association studies remains challenging for myriad reasons. In the case of epistatic interactions, the large number of potential interacting sets of genes presents computational, multiple hypothesis correction, and other statistical power issues. In the case of gene-environment interactions, the lack of consistently measured environmental covariates in most disease studies precludes searching for interactions and creates difficulties for replicating studies.

RESULTS: In this work, we develop a new statistical approach to address these issues that leverages genetic ancestry, defined as the proportion of ancestry derived from each ancestral population (e.g., the fraction of European/African ancestry in African Americans), in admixed populations. We applied our method to gene expression and methylation data from African American and Latino admixed individuals, respectively, identifying nine interactions that were significant at P<5{\texttimes}10-8. We show that two of the interactions in methylation data replicate, and the remaining six are significantly enriched for low P-values (P<1.8{\texttimes}10-6).

CONCLUSION: We show that genetic ancestry can be a useful proxy for unknown and unmeasured covariates in the search for interaction effects. These results have important implications for our understanding of the genetic architecture of complex traits.

}, keywords = {African Americans, African Continental Ancestry Group, DNA Methylation, Epistasis, Genetic, European Continental Ancestry Group, Gene-Environment Interaction, Hispanic Americans, Humans, Models, Genetic, Phenotype}, issn = {1098-2272}, doi = {10.1002/gepi.22087}, author = {Park, Danny S and Eskin, Itamar and Kang, Eun Yong and Gamazon, Eric R and Eng, Celeste and Gignoux, Christopher R and Galanter, Joshua M and Burchard, Esteban and Ye, Chun J and Aschard, Hugues and Eskin, Eleazar and Halperin, Eran and Zaitlen, Noah} }