@article {123, title = {Efficient Estimation and Applications of Cross-Validated Genetic Predictions to Polygenic Risk Scores and Linear Mixed Models.}, journal = {J Comput Biol}, volume = {27}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 04}, pages = {599-612}, abstract = {

Large-scale cohorts with combined genetic and phenotypic data, coupled with methodological advances, have produced increasingly accurate genetic predictors of complex human phenotypes called polygenic risk scores (PRSs). In addition to the potential translational impacts of identifying at-risk individuals, PRS are being utilized for a growing list of scientific applications, including causal inference, identifying pleiotropy and genetic correlation, and powerful gene-based and mixed-model association tests. Existing PRS approaches rely on external large-scale genetic cohorts that have also measured the phenotype of interest. They further require matching on ancestry and genotyping platform or imputation quality. In this work, we present a novel reference-free method to produce a PRS that does not rely on an external cohort. We show that naive implementations of reference-free PRS either result in substantial overfitting or prohibitive increases in computational time. We show that our algorithm avoids both of these issues and can produce informative in-sample PRSs over a single cohort without overfitting. We then demonstrate several novel applications of reference-free PRSs, including detection of pleiotropy across 246 metabolic traits and efficient mixed-model association testing.

}, issn = {1557-8666}, doi = {10.1089/cmb.2019.0325}, author = {Mefford, Joel and Park, Danny and Zheng, Zhili and Ko, Arthur and Ala-Korpela, Mika and Laakso, Markku and Pajukanta, P{\"a}ivi and Yang, Jian and Witte, John and Zaitlen, Noah} } @article {124, title = {Modeling epistasis in mice and yeast using the proportion of two or more distinct genetic backgrounds: Evidence for "polygenic epistasis".}, journal = {PLoS Genet}, volume = {16}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 10}, pages = {e1009165}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: The majority of quantitative genetic models used to map complex traits assume that alleles have similar effects across all individuals. Significant evidence suggests, however, that epistatic interactions modulate the impact of many alleles. Nevertheless, identifying epistatic interactions remains computationally and statistically challenging. In this work, we address some of these challenges by developing a statistical test for polygenic epistasis that determines whether the effect of an allele is altered by the global genetic ancestry proportion from distinct progenitors.

RESULTS: We applied our method to data from mice and yeast. For the mice, we observed 49 significant genotype-by-ancestry interaction associations across 14 phenotypes as well as over 1,400 Bonferroni-corrected genotype-by-ancestry interaction associations for mouse gene expression data. For the yeast, we observed 92 significant genotype-by-ancestry interactions across 38 phenotypes. Given this evidence of epistasis, we test for and observe evidence of rapid selection pressure on ancestry specific polymorphisms within one of the cohorts, consistent with epistatic selection.

CONCLUSIONS: Unlike our prior work in human populations, we observe widespread evidence of ancestry-modified SNP effects, perhaps reflecting the greater divergence present in crosses using mice and yeast.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Animals, Epistasis, Genetic, Evolution, Molecular, Genotype, Humans, Mice, Models, Genetic, Multifactorial Inheritance, Phenotype, Quantitative Trait Loci, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Selection, Genetic}, issn = {1553-7404}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1009165}, author = {Rau, Christoph D and Gonzales, Natalia M and Bloom, Joshua S and Park, Danny and Ayroles, Julien and Palmer, Abraham A and Lusis, Aldons J and Zaitlen, Noah} }