@article {100, title = {On the cross-population generalizability of gene expression prediction models.}, journal = {PLoS Genet}, volume = {16}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 08}, pages = {e1008927}, abstract = {

The genetic control of gene expression is a core component of human physiology. For the past several years, transcriptome-wide association studies have leveraged large datasets of linked genotype and RNA sequencing information to create a powerful gene-based test of association that has been used in dozens of studies. While numerous discoveries have been made, the populations in the training data are overwhelmingly of European descent, and little is known about the generalizability of these models to other populations. Here, we test for cross-population generalizability of gene expression prediction models using a dataset of African American individuals with RNA-Seq data in whole blood. We find that the default models trained in large datasets such as GTEx and DGN fare poorly in African Americans, with a notable reduction in prediction accuracy when compared to European Americans. We replicate these limitations in cross-population generalizability using the five populations in the GEUVADIS dataset. Via realistic simulations of both populations and gene expression, we show that accurate cross-population generalizability of transcriptome prediction only arises when eQTL architecture is substantially shared across populations. In contrast, models with non-identical eQTLs showed patterns similar to real-world data. Therefore, generating RNA-Seq data in diverse populations is a critical step towards multi-ethnic utility of gene expression prediction.

}, keywords = {African Americans, Gene Expression Profiling, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Models, Genetic, Quantitative Trait Loci, Reference Standards, RNA-Seq, Transcriptome}, issn = {1553-7404}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1008927}, author = {Keys, Kevin L and Mak, Angel C Y and White, Marquitta J and Eckalbar, Walter L and Dahl, Andrew W and Mefford, Joel and Mikhaylova, Anna V and Contreras, Mar{\'\i}a G and Elhawary, Jennifer R and Eng, Celeste and Hu, Donglei and Huntsman, Scott and Oh, Sam S and Salazar, Sandra and LeNoir, Michael A and Ye, Jimmie C and Thornton, Timothy A and Zaitlen, Noah and Burchard, Esteban G and Gignoux, Christopher R} } @article {124, title = {Modeling epistasis in mice and yeast using the proportion of two or more distinct genetic backgrounds: Evidence for "polygenic epistasis".}, journal = {PLoS Genet}, volume = {16}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 10}, pages = {e1009165}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: The majority of quantitative genetic models used to map complex traits assume that alleles have similar effects across all individuals. Significant evidence suggests, however, that epistatic interactions modulate the impact of many alleles. Nevertheless, identifying epistatic interactions remains computationally and statistically challenging. In this work, we address some of these challenges by developing a statistical test for polygenic epistasis that determines whether the effect of an allele is altered by the global genetic ancestry proportion from distinct progenitors.

RESULTS: We applied our method to data from mice and yeast. For the mice, we observed 49 significant genotype-by-ancestry interaction associations across 14 phenotypes as well as over 1,400 Bonferroni-corrected genotype-by-ancestry interaction associations for mouse gene expression data. For the yeast, we observed 92 significant genotype-by-ancestry interactions across 38 phenotypes. Given this evidence of epistasis, we test for and observe evidence of rapid selection pressure on ancestry specific polymorphisms within one of the cohorts, consistent with epistatic selection.

CONCLUSIONS: Unlike our prior work in human populations, we observe widespread evidence of ancestry-modified SNP effects, perhaps reflecting the greater divergence present in crosses using mice and yeast.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Animals, Epistasis, Genetic, Evolution, Molecular, Genotype, Humans, Mice, Models, Genetic, Multifactorial Inheritance, Phenotype, Quantitative Trait Loci, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Selection, Genetic}, issn = {1553-7404}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1009165}, author = {Rau, Christoph D and Gonzales, Natalia M and Bloom, Joshua S and Park, Danny and Ayroles, Julien and Palmer, Abraham A and Lusis, Aldons J and Zaitlen, Noah} } @article {86, title = {A Robust Method Uncovers Significant Context-Specific Heritability in Diverse Complex Traits.}, journal = {Am J Hum Genet}, volume = {106}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 01 02}, pages = {71-91}, abstract = {

Gene-environment interactions (GxE) can be fundamental in applications ranging from functional genomics to precision medicine and is a conjectured source of substantial heritability. However, unbiased methods to profile GxE genome-wide are nascent and, as we show, cannot accommodate general environment variables, modest sample sizes, heterogeneous noise, and binary traits. To address this gap, we propose a simple, unifying mixed model for gene-environment interaction (GxEMM). In simulations and theory, we show that GxEMM can dramatically improve estimates and eliminate false positives when the assumptions of existing methods fail. We apply GxEMM to a range of human and model organism datasets and find broad evidence of context-specific genetic effects, including GxSex, GxAdversity, and GxDisease interactions across thousands of clinical and molecular phenotypes. Overall, GxEMM is broadly applicable for testing and quantifying polygenic interactions, which can be useful for explaining heritability and invaluable for determining biologically relevant environments.

}, keywords = {Adult, Animals, Computer Simulation, Female, Gene-Environment Interaction, Genetic Markers, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Male, Mental Disorders, Middle Aged, Models, Genetic, Multifactorial Inheritance, Phenomics, Phenotype, Rats}, issn = {1537-6605}, doi = {10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.11.015}, author = {Dahl, Andy and Nguyen, Khiem and Cai, Na and Gandal, Michael J and Flint, Jonathan and Zaitlen, Noah} } @article {59, title = {Adjusting for Principal Components of Molecular Phenotypes Induces Replicating False Positives.}, journal = {Genetics}, volume = {211}, year = {2019}, month = {2019 04}, pages = {1179-1189}, abstract = {

High-throughput measurements of molecular phenotypes provide an unprecedented opportunity to model cellular processes and their impact on disease. These highly structured datasets are usually strongly confounded, creating false positives and reducing power. This has motivated many approaches based on principal components analysis (PCA) to estimate and correct for confounders, which have become indispensable elements of association tests between molecular phenotypes and both genetic and nongenetic factors. Here, we show that these correction approaches induce a bias, and that it persists for large sample sizes and replicates out-of-sample. We prove this theoretically for PCA by deriving an analytic, deterministic, and intuitive bias approximation. We assess other methods with realistic simulations, which show that perturbing any of several basic parameters can cause false positive rate (FPR) inflation. Our experiments show the bias depends on covariate and confounder sparsity, effect sizes, and their correlation. Surprisingly, when the covariate and confounder have [Formula: see text], standard two-step methods all have [Formula: see text]-fold FPR inflation. Our analysis informs best practices for confounder correction in genomic studies, and suggests many false discoveries have been made and replicated in some differential expression analyses.

}, keywords = {Animals, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Principal Component Analysis, Quantitative Trait Loci, Reproducibility of Results}, issn = {1943-2631}, doi = {10.1534/genetics.118.301768}, author = {Dahl, Andy and Guillemot, Vincent and Mefford, Joel and Aschard, Hugues and Zaitlen, Noah} } @article {37, title = {An ancestry-based approach for detecting interactions.}, journal = {Genet Epidemiol}, volume = {42}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 02}, pages = {49-63}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Epistasis and gene-environment interactions are known to contribute significantly to variation of complex phenotypes in model organisms. However, their identification in human association studies remains challenging for myriad reasons. In the case of epistatic interactions, the large number of potential interacting sets of genes presents computational, multiple hypothesis correction, and other statistical power issues. In the case of gene-environment interactions, the lack of consistently measured environmental covariates in most disease studies precludes searching for interactions and creates difficulties for replicating studies.

RESULTS: In this work, we develop a new statistical approach to address these issues that leverages genetic ancestry, defined as the proportion of ancestry derived from each ancestral population (e.g., the fraction of European/African ancestry in African Americans), in admixed populations. We applied our method to gene expression and methylation data from African American and Latino admixed individuals, respectively, identifying nine interactions that were significant at P<5{\texttimes}10-8. We show that two of the interactions in methylation data replicate, and the remaining six are significantly enriched for low P-values (P<1.8{\texttimes}10-6).

CONCLUSION: We show that genetic ancestry can be a useful proxy for unknown and unmeasured covariates in the search for interaction effects. These results have important implications for our understanding of the genetic architecture of complex traits.

}, keywords = {African Americans, African Continental Ancestry Group, DNA Methylation, Epistasis, Genetic, European Continental Ancestry Group, Gene-Environment Interaction, Hispanic Americans, Humans, Models, Genetic, Phenotype}, issn = {1098-2272}, doi = {10.1002/gepi.22087}, author = {Park, Danny S and Eskin, Itamar and Kang, Eun Yong and Gamazon, Eric R and Eng, Celeste and Gignoux, Christopher R and Galanter, Joshua M and Burchard, Esteban and Ye, Chun J and Aschard, Hugues and Eskin, Eleazar and Halperin, Eran and Zaitlen, Noah} } @article {21, title = {Covariate selection for association screening in multiphenotype genetic studies.}, journal = {Nat Genet}, volume = {49}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Dec}, pages = {1789-1795}, abstract = {

Testing for associations in big data faces the problem of multiple comparisons, wherein true signals are difficult to detect on the background of all associations queried. This difficulty is particularly salient in human genetic association studies, in which phenotypic variation is often driven by numerous variants of small effect. The current strategy to improve power to identify these weak associations consists of applying standard marginal statistical approaches and increasing study sample sizes. Although successful, this approach does not leverage the environmental and genetic factors shared among the multiple phenotypes collected in contemporary cohorts. Here we developed covariates for multiphenotype studies (CMS), an approach that improves power when correlated phenotypes are measured on the same samples. Our analyses of real and simulated data provide direct evidence that correlated phenotypes can be used to achieve increases in power to levels often surpassing the power gained by a twofold increase in sample size.

}, keywords = {Algorithms, Genetic Association Studies, Genetic Variation, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Humans, Models, Genetic, Multivariate Analysis, Phenotype, Reproducibility of Results, Sample Size}, issn = {1546-1718}, doi = {10.1038/ng.3975}, author = {Aschard, Hugues and Guillemot, Vincent and Vilhjalmsson, Bjarni and Patel, Chirag J and Skurnik, David and Ye, Chun J and Wolpin, Brian and Kraft, Peter and Zaitlen, Noah} } @article {7, title = {The Effects of Migration and Assortative Mating on Admixture Linkage Disequilibrium.}, journal = {Genetics}, volume = {205}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 Jan}, pages = {375-383}, abstract = {

Statistical models in medical and population genetics typically assume that individuals assort randomly in a population. While this simplifies model complexity, it contradicts an increasing body of evidence of nonrandom mating in human populations. Specifically, it has been shown that assortative mating is significantly affected by genomic ancestry. In this work, we examine the effects of ancestry-assortative mating on the linkage disequilibrium between local ancestry tracks of individuals in an admixed population. To accomplish this, we develop an extension to the Wright-Fisher model that allows for ancestry-based assortative mating. We show that ancestry-assortment perturbs the distribution of local ancestry linkage disequilibrium (LAD) and the variance of ancestry in a population as a function of the number of generations since admixture. This assortment effect can induce errors in demographic inference of admixed populations when methods assume random mating. We derive closed form formulae for LAD under an assortative-mating model with and without migration. We observe that LAD depends on the correlation of global ancestry of couples in each generation, the migration rate of each of the ancestral populations, the initial proportions of ancestral populations, and the number of generations since admixture. We also present the first direct evidence of ancestry-assortment in African Americans and examine LAD in simulated and real admixed population data of African Americans. We find that demographic inference under the assumption of random mating significantly underestimates the number of generations since admixture, and that accounting for assortative mating using the patterns of LAD results in estimates that more closely agrees with the historical narrative.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Black or African American, Datasets as Topic, Gene Frequency, Genetics, Population, Genomics, Human Migration, Humans, Linkage Disequilibrium, Models, Genetic, Models, Statistical, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide}, issn = {1943-2631}, doi = {10.1534/genetics.116.192138}, author = {Zaitlen, Noah and Huntsman, Scott and Hu, Donglei and Spear, Melissa and Eng, Celeste and Oh, Sam S and White, Marquitta J and Mak, Angel and Davis, Adam and Meade, Kelly and Brigino-Buenaventura, Emerita and LeNoir, Michael A and Bibbins-Domingo, Kirsten and Burchard, Esteban G and Halperin, Eran} }