@article {129, title = {Integration of multiomic annotation data to prioritize and characterize inflammation and immune-related risk variants in squamous cell lung cancer.}, journal = {Genet Epidemiol}, volume = {45}, year = {2021}, month = {2021 Feb}, pages = {99-114}, abstract = {

Clinical trial results have recently demonstrated that inhibiting inflammation by targeting the interleukin-1β pathway can offer a significant reduction in lung cancer incidence and mortality, highlighting a pressing and unmet need to understand the benefits of inflammation-focused lung cancer therapies at the genetic level. While numerous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have explored the genetic etiology of lung cancer, there remains a large gap between the type of information that may be gleaned from an association study and the depth of understanding necessary to explain and drive translational findings. Thus, in this study we jointly model and integrate extensive multiomics data sources, utilizing a total of 40 genome-wide functional annotations that augment previously published results from the International Lung Cancer Consortium (ILCCO) GWAS, to prioritize and characterize single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that increase risk of squamous cell lung cancer through the inflammatory and immune responses. Our work bridges the gap between correlative analysis and translational follow-up research, refining GWAS association measures in an interpretable and systematic manner. In particular, reanalysis of the ILCCO data highlights the impact of highly associated SNPs from nuclear factor-κB signaling pathway genes as well as major histocompatibility complex mediated variation in immune responses. One consequence of prioritizing likely functional SNPs is the pruning of variants that might be selected for follow-up work by over an order of magnitude, from potentially tens of thousands to hundreds. The strategies we introduce provide informative and interpretable approaches for incorporating extensive genome-wide annotation data in analysis of genetic association studies.

}, issn = {1098-2272}, doi = {10.1002/gepi.22358}, author = {Sun, Ryan and Xu, Miao and Li, Xihao and Gaynor, Sheila and Zhou, Hufeng and Li, Zilin and Boss{\'e}, Yohan and Lam, Stephen and Tsao, Ming-Sound and Tardon, Adonina and Chen, Chu and Doherty, Jennifer and Goodman, Gary and Bojesen, Stig E and Landi, Maria T and Johansson, Mattias and Field, John K and Bickeb{\"o}ller, Heike and Wichmann, H-Erich and Risch, Angela and Rennert, Gadi and Arnold, Suzanne and Wu, Xifeng and Melander, Olle and Brunnstr{\"o}m, Hans and Le Marchand, Loic and Liu, Geoffrey and Andrew, Angeline and Duell, Eric and Kiemeney, Lambertus A and Shen, Hongbing and Haugen, Aage and Johansson, Mikael and Grankvist, Kjell and Caporaso, Neil and Woll, Penella and Dawn Teare, M and Scelo, Ghislaine and Hong, Yun-Chul and Yuan, Jian-Min and Lazarus, Philip and Schabath, Matthew B and Aldrich, Melinda C and Albanes, Demetrios and Mak, Raymond and Barbie, David and Brennan, Paul and Hung, Rayjean J and Amos, Christopher I and Christiani, David C and Lin, Xihong} } @article {99, title = {Dynamic incorporation of multiple in silico functional annotations empowers rare variant association analysis of large whole-genome sequencing studies at scale.}, journal = {Nat Genet}, volume = {52}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 09}, pages = {969-983}, abstract = {

Large-scale whole-genome sequencing studies have enabled the analysis of rare variants (RVs) associated with complex phenotypes. Commonly used RV association tests have limited scope to leverage variant functions. We propose STAAR (variant-set test for association using annotation information), a scalable and powerful RV association test method that effectively incorporates both variant categories and multiple complementary annotations using a dynamic weighting scheme. For the latter, we introduce {\textquoteright}annotation principal components{\textquoteright}, multidimensional summaries of in silico variant annotations. STAAR accounts for population structure and relatedness and is scalable for analyzing very large cohort and biobank whole-genome sequencing studies of continuous and dichotomous traits. We applied STAAR to identify RVs associated with four lipid traits in 12,316 discovery and 17,822 replication samples from the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine Program. We discovered and replicated new RV associations, including disruptive missense RVs of NPC1L1 and an intergenic region near APOC1P1 associated with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

}, keywords = {Cholesterol, LDL, Computer Simulation, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Variation, Genome, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Models, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Annotation, Phenotype, Whole Genome Sequencing}, issn = {1546-1718}, doi = {10.1038/s41588-020-0676-4}, author = {Li, Xihao and Li, Zilin and Zhou, Hufeng and Gaynor, Sheila M and Liu, Yaowu and Chen, Han and Sun, Ryan and Dey, Rounak and Arnett, Donna K and Aslibekyan, Stella and Ballantyne, Christie M and Bielak, Lawrence F and Blangero, John and Boerwinkle, Eric and Bowden, Donald W and Broome, Jai G and Conomos, Matthew P and Correa, Adolfo and Cupples, L Adrienne and Curran, Joanne E and Freedman, Barry I and Guo, Xiuqing and Hindy, George and Irvin, Marguerite R and Kardia, Sharon L R and Kathiresan, Sekar and Khan, Alyna T and Kooperberg, Charles L and Laurie, Cathy C and Liu, X Shirley and Mahaney, Michael C and Manichaikul, Ani W and Martin, Lisa W and Mathias, Rasika A and McGarvey, Stephen T and Mitchell, Braxton D and Montasser, May E and Moore, Jill E and Morrison, Alanna C and O{\textquoteright}Connell, Jeffrey R and Palmer, Nicholette D and Pampana, Akhil and Peralta, Juan M and Peyser, Patricia A and Psaty, Bruce M and Redline, Susan and Rice, Kenneth M and Rich, Stephen S and Smith, Jennifer A and Tiwari, Hemant K and Tsai, Michael Y and Vasan, Ramachandran S and Wang, Fei Fei and Weeks, Daniel E and Weng, Zhiping and Wilson, James G and Yanek, Lisa R and Neale, Benjamin M and Sunyaev, Shamil R and Abecasis, Gon{\c c}alo R and Rotter, Jerome I and Willer, Cristen J and Peloso, Gina M and Natarajan, Pradeep and Lin, Xihong} } @article {20, title = {Testing for gene-environment interaction under exposure misspecification.}, journal = {Biometrics}, volume = {74}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Jun}, pages = {653-662}, abstract = {

Complex interplay between genetic and environmental factors characterizes the etiology of many diseases. Modeling gene-environment (GxE) interactions is often challenged by the unknown functional form of the environment term in the true data-generating mechanism. We study the impact of misspecification of the environmental exposure effect on inference for the GxE interaction term in linear and logistic regression models. We first examine the asymptotic bias of the GxE interaction regression coefficient, allowing for confounders as well as arbitrary misspecification of the exposure and confounder effects. For linear regression, we show that under gene-environment independence and some confounder-dependent conditions, when the environment effect is misspecified, the regression coefficient of the GxE interaction can be unbiased. However, inference on the GxE interaction is still often incorrect. In logistic regression, we show that the regression coefficient is generally biased if the genetic factor is associated with the outcome directly or indirectly. Further, we show that the standard robust sandwich variance estimator for the GxE interaction does not perform well in practical GxE studies, and we provide an alternative testing procedure that has better finite sample properties.

}, keywords = {Bias, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic, Environmental Exposure, Gene-Environment Interaction, Humans, Linear Models, Models, Genetic, Scientific Experimental Error}, issn = {1541-0420}, doi = {10.1111/biom.12813}, author = {Sun, Ryan and Carroll, Raymond J and Christiani, David C and Lin, Xihong} }