@article {121, title = {A fast and scalable framework for large-scale and ultrahigh-dimensional sparse regression with application to the UK Biobank.}, journal = {PLoS Genet}, volume = {16}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 10}, pages = {e1009141}, abstract = {

The UK Biobank is a very large, prospective population-based cohort study across the United Kingdom. It provides unprecedented opportunities for researchers to investigate the relationship between genotypic information and phenotypes of interest. Multiple regression methods, compared with genome-wide association studies (GWAS), have already been showed to greatly improve the prediction performance for a variety of phenotypes. In the high-dimensional settings, the lasso, since its first proposal in statistics, has been proved to be an effective method for simultaneous variable selection and estimation. However, the large-scale and ultrahigh dimension seen in the UK Biobank pose new challenges for applying the lasso method, as many existing algorithms and their implementations are not scalable to large applications. In this paper, we propose a computational framework called batch screening iterative lasso (BASIL) that can take advantage of any existing lasso solver and easily build a scalable solution for very large data, including those that are larger than the memory size. We introduce snpnet, an R package that implements the proposed algorithm on top of glmnet and optimizes for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) datasets. It currently supports l1-penalized linear model, logistic regression, Cox model, and also extends to the elastic net with l1/l2 penalty. We demonstrate results on the UK Biobank dataset, where we achieve competitive predictive performance for all four phenotypes considered (height, body mass index, asthma, high cholesterol) using only a small fraction of the variants compared with other established polygenic risk score methods.

}, keywords = {Algorithms, Asthma, Biological Specimen Banks, Body Height, Body Mass Index, Cholesterol, Cohort Studies, Genetics, Population, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Humans, Logistic Models, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Proportional Hazards Models, United Kingdom}, issn = {1553-7404}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1009141}, author = {Qian, Junyang and Tanigawa, Yosuke and Du, Wenfei and Aguirre, Matthew and Chang, Chris and Tibshirani, Robert and Rivas, Manuel A and Hastie, Trevor} } @article {119, title = {Fast Lasso method for large-scale and ultrahigh-dimensional Cox model with applications to UK Biobank.}, journal = {Biostatistics}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 Sep 29}, abstract = {

We develop a scalable and highly efficient algorithm to fit a Cox proportional hazard model by maximizing the $L^1$-regularized (Lasso) partial likelihood function, based on the Batch Screening Iterative Lasso (BASIL) method developed in Qian and others (2019). Our algorithm is particularly suitable for large-scale and high-dimensional data that do not fit in the memory. The output of our algorithm is the full Lasso path, the parameter estimates at all predefined regularization parameters, as well as their validation accuracy measured using the concordance index (C-index) or the validation deviance. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm, we analyze a large genotype-survival time dataset across 306 disease outcomes from the UK Biobank (Sudlow and others, 2015). We provide a publicly available implementation of the proposed approach for genetics data on top of the PLINK2 package and name it snpnet-Cox.

}, issn = {1468-4357}, doi = {10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa038}, author = {Li, Ruilin and Chang, Christopher and Justesen, Johanne M and Tanigawa, Yosuke and Qiang, Junyang and Hastie, Trevor and Rivas, Manuel A and Tibshirani, Robert} } @article {104, title = {FasTag: Automatic text classification of unstructured medical narratives.}, journal = {PLoS One}, volume = {15}, year = {2020}, month = {2020}, pages = {e0234647}, abstract = {

Unstructured clinical narratives are continuously being recorded as part of delivery of care in electronic health records, and dedicated tagging staff spend considerable effort manually assigning clinical codes for billing purposes. Despite these efforts, however, label availability and accuracy are both suboptimal. In this retrospective study, we aimed to automate the assignment of top-level International Classification of Diseases version 9 (ICD-9) codes to clinical records from human and veterinary data stores using minimal manual labor and feature curation. Automating top-level annotations could in turn enable rapid cohort identification, especially in a veterinary setting. To this end, we trained long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural networks (RNNs) on 52,722 human and 89,591 veterinary records. We investigated the accuracy of both separate-domain and combined-domain models and probed model portability. We established relevant baseline classification performances by training Decision Trees (DT) and Random Forests (RF). We also investigated whether transforming the data using MetaMap Lite, a clinical natural language processing tool, affected classification performance. We showed that the LSTM-RNNs accurately classify veterinary and human text narratives into top-level categories with an average weighted macro F1 score of 0.74 and 0.68 respectively. In the "neoplasia" category, the model trained on veterinary data had a high validation accuracy in veterinary data and moderate accuracy in human data, with F1 scores of 0.91 and 0.70 respectively. Our LSTM method scored slightly higher than that of the DT and RF models. The use of LSTM-RNN models represents a scalable structure that could prove useful in cohort identification for comparative oncology studies. Digitization of human and veterinary health information will continue to be a reality, particularly in the form of unstructured narratives. Our approach is a step forward for these two domains to learn from and inform one another.

}, keywords = {Animals, Automation, Data Mining, Databases as Topic, Humans, Narrative Medicine, Reproducibility of Results, Software, Species Specificity}, issn = {1932-6203}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0234647}, author = {Venkataraman, Guhan Ram and Pineda, Arturo Lopez and Bear Don{\textquoteright}t Walk Iv, Oliver J and Zehnder, Ashley M and Ayyar, Sandeep and Page, Rodney L and Bustamante, Carlos D and Rivas, Manuel A} } @article {44, title = {Fine-mapping and functional studies highlight potential causal variants for rheumatoid arthritis and type 1 diabetes.}, journal = {Nat Genet}, volume = {50}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 10}, pages = {1366-1374}, abstract = {

To define potentially causal variants for autoimmune disease, we fine-mapped 76 rheumatoid arthritis (11,475 cases, 15,870 controls) and type 1 diabetes loci (9,334 cases, 11,111 controls). After sequencing 799 1-kilobase regulatory (H3K4me3) regions within these loci in 568 individuals, we observed accurate imputation for 89\% of common variants. We defined credible sets of <=5 causal variants at 5 rheumatoid arthritis and 10 type 1 diabetes loci. We identified potentially causal missense variants at DNASE1L3, PTPN22, SH2B3, and TYK2, and noncoding variants at MEG3, CD28-CTLA4, and IL2RA. We also identified potential candidate causal variants at SIRPG and TNFAIP3. Using functional assays, we confirmed allele-specific protein binding and differential enhancer activity for three variants: the CD28-CTLA4 rs117701653 SNP, MEG3 rs34552516 indel, and TNFAIP3 rs35926684 indel.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Case-Control Studies, CD28 Antigens, Chromosome Mapping, CTLA-4 Antigen, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Gene Frequency, Genetic Loci, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Jurkat Cells, Mutation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, RNA, Long Noncoding, Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha-Induced Protein 3}, issn = {1546-1718}, doi = {10.1038/s41588-018-0216-7}, author = {Westra, Harm-Jan and Mart{\'\i}nez-Bonet, Marta and Onengut-Gumuscu, Suna and Lee, Annette and Luo, Yang and Teslovich, Nikola and Worthington, Jane and Martin, Javier and Huizinga, Tom and Klareskog, Lars and Rantapaa-Dahlqvist, Solbritt and Chen, Wei-Min and Quinlan, Aaron and Todd, John A and Eyre, Steve and Nigrovic, Peter A and Gregersen, Peter K and Rich, Stephen S and Raychaudhuri, Soumya} } @article {40, title = {Functional architecture of low-frequency variants highlights strength of negative selection across coding and non-coding annotations.}, journal = {Nat Genet}, volume = {50}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 11}, pages = {1600-1607}, abstract = {

Common variant heritability has been widely reported to be concentrated in variants within cell-type-specific non-coding functional annotations, but little is known about low-frequency variant functional architectures. We partitioned the heritability of both low-frequency (0.5\%<= minor allele frequency <5\%) and common (minor allele frequency >=5\%) variants in 40 UK Biobank traits across a broad set of functional annotations. We determined that non-synonymous coding variants explain 17 {\textpm} 1\% of low-frequency variant heritability ([Formula: see text]) versus 2.1 {\textpm} 0.2\% of common variant heritability ([Formula: see text]). Cell-type-specific non-coding annotations that were significantly enriched for [Formula: see text] of corresponding traits were similarly enriched for [Formula: see text] for most traits, but more enriched for brain-related annotations and traits. For example, H3K4me3 marks in brain dorsolateral prefrontal cortex explain 57 {\textpm} 12\% of [Formula: see text] versus 12 {\textpm} 2\% of [Formula: see text] for neuroticism. Forward simulations confirmed that low-frequency variant enrichment depends on the mean selection coefficient of causal variants in the annotation, and can be used to predict effect size variance of causal rare variants (minor allele frequency <0.5\%).

}, keywords = {Alleles, Biological Specimen Banks, European Continental Ancestry Group, Gene Frequency, Genetic Variation, Genetics, Population, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Linkage Disequilibrium, Molecular Sequence Annotation, Open Reading Frames, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Selection, Genetic, United Kingdom}, issn = {1546-1718}, doi = {10.1038/s41588-018-0231-8}, author = {Gazal, Steven and Loh, Po-Ru and Finucane, Hilary K and Ganna, Andrea and Schoech, Armin and Sunyaev, Shamil and Price, Alkes L} } @article {43, title = {Functional equivalence of genome sequencing analysis pipelines enables harmonized variant calling across human genetics projects.}, journal = {Nat Commun}, volume = {9}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 10 02}, pages = {4038}, abstract = {

Hundreds of thousands of human whole genome sequencing (WGS) datasets will be generated over the next few years. These data are more valuable in aggregate: joint analysis of genomes from many sources increases sample size and statistical power. A central challenge for joint analysis is that different WGS data processing pipelines cause substantial differences in variant calling in combined datasets, necessitating computationally expensive reprocessing. This approach is no longer tenable given the scale of current studies and data volumes. Here, we define WGS data processing standards that allow different groups to produce functionally equivalent (FE) results, yet still innovate on data processing pipelines. We present initial FE pipelines developed at five genome centers and show that they yield similar variant calling results and produce significantly less variability than sequencing replicates. This work alleviates a key technical bottleneck for genome aggregation and helps lay the foundation for community-wide human genetics studies.

}, keywords = {Genome, Human, Human Genetics, Humans, Whole Genome Sequencing}, issn = {2041-1723}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-018-06159-4}, author = {Regier, Allison A and Farjoun, Yossi and Larson, David E and Krasheninina, Olga and Kang, Hyun Min and Howrigan, Daniel P and Chen, Bo-Juen and Kher, Manisha and Banks, Eric and Ames, Darren C and English, Adam C and Li, Heng and Xing, Jinchuan and Zhang, Yeting and Matise, Tara and Abecasis, Gon{\c c}alo R and Salerno, Will and Zody, Michael C and Neale, Benjamin M and Hall, Ira M} } @article {31, title = {Functional genomics of stromal cells in chronic inflammatory diseases.}, journal = {Curr Opin Rheumatol}, volume = {30}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Jan}, pages = {65-71}, abstract = {

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Stroma is a broad term referring to the connective tissue matrix in which other cells reside. It is composed of diverse cell types with functions such as extracellular matrix maintenance, blood and lymph vessel development, and effector cell recruitment. The tissue microenvironment is determined by the molecular characteristics and relative abundances of different stromal cells such as fibroblasts, endothelial cells, pericytes, and mesenchymal precursor cells. Stromal cell heterogeneity is explained by embryonic developmental lineage, stages of differentiation to other cell types, and activation states. Interaction between immune and stromal cell types is critical to wound healing, cancer, and a wide range of inflammatory diseases. Here, we review recent studies of inflammatory diseases that use functional genomics and single-cell technologies to identify and characterize stromal cell types associated with pathogenesis.

RECENT FINDINGS: High dimensional strategies using mRNA sequencing, mass cytometry, and fluorescence activated cell-sorting with fresh primary tissue samples are producing detailed views of what is happening in diseased tissue in rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and cancer. Fibroblasts positive for CD90 (Thy-1) are enriched in the synovium of rheumatoid arthritis patients. Single-cell RNA-seq studies will lead to more discoveries about the stroma in the near future.

SUMMARY: Stromal cells form the microenvironment of inflamed and diseased tissues. Functional genomics is producing an increasingly detailed view of subsets of stromal cells with pathogenic functions in rheumatic diseases and cancer. Future genomics studies will discover disease mechanisms by perturbing molecular pathways with chemokines and therapies known to affect patient outcomes. Functional genomics studies with large sample sizes of patient tissues will identify patient subsets with different disease phenotypes or treatment responses.

}, keywords = {Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Cell Differentiation, Chemokines, Endothelial Cells, Fibroblasts, Flow Cytometry, Genomics, Humans, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Pericytes, Rheumatic Diseases, RNA, Messenger, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Single-Cell Analysis, Stromal Cells, Synovial Membrane, Thy-1 Antigens}, issn = {1531-6963}, doi = {10.1097/BOR.0000000000000455}, author = {Slowikowski, Kamil and Wei, Kevin and Brenner, Michael B and Raychaudhuri, Soumya} }